<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael S. Pascua &#187; computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelspascua.com/tag/computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelspascua.com</link>
	<description>Freelancer, Grad Student, Singer, Y-List Celebrity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Such a beautiful day for an error.</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/such-a-beautiful-day-for-an-error/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/such-a-beautiful-day-for-an-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Website Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelspascua.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m having website meltdown. At the moment I hate HTML. I really do. HTML, CSS, Javascript. Everything. Why can’t websites be drawn on a piece of paper, scanned, and then mysteriously just work the way you wanted? Of course I have to struggle my way around with my small web bag of tricks, trying to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m having website meltdown. At the moment I hate HTML. I really do. HTML, CSS, Javascript. Everything. Why can’t websites be drawn on a piece of paper, scanned, and then mysteriously just work the way you wanted? Of course I have to struggle my way around with my small web bag of tricks, trying to make this webpage as effective as possible.<br />
<P><br />
It’s pretty, but not exactly everything I wished for, you know? Sometimes the image in my head doesn’t match the drawing on the picture.<br />
<P><br />
Anywho, I realized that one thing that websites are supposed to do is increase the length of time one person is on it for a while. How is a personal website supposed to do that? I’m not going to offer games, contests, or giveaways. That’s not my style and I’ve heard from other webmasters that giveaways aren’t as helpful to increasing readership. It causes a spike then disappears again. <em>Moot</em>. That’s what it is.<br />
<P><br />
<span id="more-264"></span></p>
<p>Back to the question: how do I not jump the shark? I can’t do things like hype other people, mostly because I have no writer friends (<em>*hint* let&#8217;s be friends! *hint*</em>). I would have a link page if a) I<em> would admit that most are Disney links</em> and b)<em> I give away where some of my writing inspiration comes from</em>. Yes, I’ll add more photos, but the problem lies in the fact that I actually have to reduce the size of the photos and it’s a bitch I tell you.<br />
<P><br />
I used to have a bookmark tab of other writers/journalists/mothers with computers that I really liked and mysteriously all of them disappeared. I will check my main computer (I’m situated in my backyard between two large citronella candles trying to keep every bug away from me) later on. Anywho, their pages were a combination of concise and yet I wandered their page for a good 15 minutes. Here?<em> Not so much</em>. I can go through it in five, but mostly because it’s actually very content thin.<br />
<P><br />
I get it: <em>I’ll work on this page.</em> I guess it’s an ever evolving thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/such-a-beautiful-day-for-an-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ugly Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/the-ugly-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/the-ugly-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music / Film / Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Writing Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[introspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelspascua.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a neck!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this underlying fear that people think writers are ugly. Probably less ugly than radio people, but still ugly. Why is that? Well, it’s because unlike television writers and radio people have a medium to fall behind, become a mask and display their work first before ever even seeing a face. I’m sure people read TV Squad and don&#8217;t even think about the person who wrote it.<br />
<P><br />
Personally, I’ve seen the images of writers, radio people, and podcasters and was taken aback. Maybe it’s true. Maybe a lot of these people are the bastard ugly children of successful television and film stars. Even the people on YouTube <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/kevjumba">have good looks</a> and usually only the good looking (or just insanely funny) YouTube videos become the most popular.<P><br />
&#8230;<P><br />
<span id="more-187"></span><br />
I’ve seen pictures of several writers on the back of their book (<em>while wandering through Barnes &#038; Noble, mind you</em>) and thought: maybe the ugly ones write. I mean look at Stephen King: great writer, kinda ugly. Then again, one of my favorite writers, Augusten Burroughs, is good looking. Well, was… I’m not that into 40-somethings. I’ve wandered his website and saw pictures of him in the 90s with his drug sheik.<br />
<P><br />
I’ve mused <a href="http://mmrev.blogspot.com/2008/07/neck-ahead.html">before</a> about a year ago about being self conscious about my neck, but I don’t consider myself ugly. With my low self esteem, let me at least think that I’m good looking. I often think in defeatist mentality, but that doesn’t make me ugly either. Sometimes, I practice taking that stereotypical black and white author photo. I laugh thinking that a) I would end up writing a how to book or b) I wouldn’t write a book. Granted, I still need a new headshot-esque picture. I have to go call Eric and hire him as my photographer. Maybe I could pay him in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewisKyyuF78">Applebees and Hot Wings</a>.<br />
<P><br />
Does that mean I picked the wrong outlet? Granted maybe I’m looking at extremes. I mean look at Ryan Seacrest. If someone that weird looking can succeed, I guess anyone can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/the-ugly-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iStrain</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/istrain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/istrain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelspascua.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have finally gotten around to rate most of my music on my iTunes. It was done before, but when I transferred all my music to my other external hard drive (which I hear is a no-no) only 3/4ths of the album covers and none of the ratings transferred over. I spent the past six [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have finally gotten around to rate most of my music on my iTunes. It was done before, but when I transferred all my music to my other external hard drive (<em>which I hear is a no-no</em>) only 3/4ths of the album covers and none of the ratings transferred over. I spent the past six months rating all the music. Now there are only 3 subjects to rate: Patsy Cline, Fleetwood Mac, and the new Franz Ferdinand album. The first two are obvious, the latter is because I haven’t had a chance to sit down and listen to it.</p>
<p>Getting to the point of the post: I could never stay on iTunes too long because after a while my eyes would start to kill me. Small black text on white background? For shame. Funny, because I am typing this on<strong> Word</strong> and have no problem, but when the text is like six point font it just hurts. That and the fact that I have more than 7000 songs (<em>my iPod claims 8,221, but my iTunes says that there are about 7,700. I’m not sure what the disconnect is</em>). I would have to rate about 100 songs a day and then die a little on the inside for the sake of organization.</p>
<p>I don’t understand why Apple has to be so stingy with their color choices. I’m sure there are people out there that can’t see or read iTunes and prefer something like <strong>Winamp</strong> with the option of skins. I just want a dark version of iTunes that comes with it. I don’t want to download some third party skin mask thing. Why isn’t there a tab for changing the colors or something?</p>
<p>Now that the ratings are done, it’s time to add album covers, album titles, track numbers, and year of release. I’m taking my time on those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelspascua.com/2009/istrain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

